Steve Bertrand wrote: > map fxp0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 > > Aside from that, are you sure that this entry shouldn't be: > > map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 > > ? Again, I don't know ipnat, but to me, in the fxp0 entry, it looks like > you are trying to map the 192 space coming INTO fxp0 (which in your > original post is the NIC that faces the ISP, not the internal network). > If this is how ipnat looks at this, then this is also a problem.
Just a note, section "30.5.16 IPNAT Rules" of the handbook states that using the external interface in the map rule is the correct way of doing things. Steve
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature