--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell <jh...@dataix.net> wrote:
> From: jhell <jh...@dataix.net> > Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player > To: "James Phillips" <anti_spam...@yahoo.ca> > Cc: email@example.com > Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM > > > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote: <Vague specific stuff about an ill-defined video standard> > > So how many different subjects are in here that don't > thread ? > > With all due respect: wheres Waldo ? > Most on-topic is probably the licensing issue: I like the GPLv3, but many BSD users don't like it for the same reasons. I don't want to publish comprehensive details about my (video format) idea until I have the format defined in a forward-compatible way. AS I am fantasy land, I think that people will try implementing incompatible versions as soon as it's published. The risk is that may happen anyway if my format is not "good enough." I haven't even done testing to find out how well compression is performed. Second-Worst case (mono white noise), I estimate that loss-less compression will only be able to compress frame changes to ~25% of the original frame size. Lossy compression will be a simple averaging of nearby pixels for (multiples of) ~4:1 compression. Mpeg is supposed to get up to 300:1. TL;DR: If you have to ask what the point is, it is probably off-topic and I can shut-up now. Regards, James Phillips __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"