On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 05:42:41AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > Just a little and quite formal side note: > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:09:19 -0700, Patrick Mahan <ma...@mahan.org> wrote: > > while (*tp != '\0' && *tp++ != '<'); > > It's often a good choice, especially for increasing readability > of code, to code the "empty statement" on a line on its own (as > you usually put any statements on an own line for clarity), so > the reader doesn't accidentally take it as and "end of command" > notification, e. g. > > while(1) > ; > > instead of > > while(1);
Agreed. I did exactly this in a code sample posted earlier in this thread. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"