Dánielisz László wrote: > I don't give it up, doing some tcpdump on my BSD I can see the dhcp > request reaches the machine, the dhcpd is running, but why doesn't gives > any IP? > > # tcpdump -i rl1 -n port 67 or port 68 > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > listening on rl1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes > 11:51:43.086597 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request > from 00:24:03:f1:bd:36, length 300 11:51:45.102260 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:24:03:f1:bd:36, length 300 [snip]
I only have a couple if ideas. First, is it possible to substitute some other non rl or re NIC for rl1? I seem to recall something about these cards having some sort of problem like this. This test would eliminate that idea. Also, right after a client machine requests a lease examine your arp tables on both machines. Maybe the dhcpd server is confused and sending the reply out the wrong interface? sockstat -4l can confirm which/what interface dhcpd is listening on, compare with arp results. Theoretically if dhcpd is bound to and listening on rl1 there shouldn't be any replies going out rl0. Check to eliminate. Wrt to a managed switch blocking ports, I think you probably ruled this out by connecting the machines to each other. Note that for GigE, or NICs that do MDI-X properly any cable will work. However, on many older 100baseTX cards this would need to be using a crossover cable to function correctly. You can also broaden your tcpdump to include arp traffic. When the output files become cumbersome to examine it's easier to look at them in Wireshark. I have a hunch if rl1 could be replaced with some old fxp or sk card lying around it might work. YMMV -Mike _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"