In response to Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org>: > Thomas Backman wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > >> I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the > >> Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O > >> shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the > >> opposite. > > Corrected link: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=1 > > > > And yeah, quite honestly: disk scheduling in FreeBSD appears to suck... The > > only reason I'm not switching from Linux. :(
"All operating systems were left with their default options during the installation process..." It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. While it would be nice if FreeBSD shipped with a more performant default setting, it would also be nice if mindless benchmark drones would quit assuming that every system ships pre-configured to perform optimally in their benchmarks. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
