On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jerry McAllister <jerr...@msu.edu> wrote: > Some of the responses have said that UFS handling of 'Dangerously > dedicated' has not gone away, just sysinstall handling of it. > That may be true and if that is true, then you can probably still > access dangerously dedicated drives. But, I would think it is a > good opportunity to convert them while the uncertainty reigns.
Once again, it has nothing at all to do with UFS. Clearly you didn't search the mailing list archives like I said you should. I removed the support from sysinstall because it was *broken* due to changes with geom. It is not a sysinstall thing, it's a "oh look, sysinstall lets you do something that doesn't work anymore" thing. You'd think if the person that made these changes to sysinstall was commenting on the issue, that should clear up any uncertainty. But you can go ahead believing whatever makes you happy. -- randi _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
