On 02/25/10 12:37, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:19:11 -0500, Glen Barber <glen.j.bar...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Siju George <sgeorge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a logitech quickcam. >> >> Although, I don't know if your particular camera is supported. > > Personally, I always avoided Logitech because their webcams > really seem to be incompatible. I had better luck with a > model from Aiptek (AEG inside).
Sent to -owners because this is the third time I've sent this mail (first time was at 12:47 CST, second was at 14:11 CST, this one is being sent at approximately 14:47 CST). If I'm bouncing, I need to know so I can contact my web/mail host and figure out what's going on. Anybody have any luck with Gateway branded web cams? It's fairly old (not sure if that will make a difference) and works pretty decently without any additional drivers under Windows (I'm assuming a generic adapter under FreeBSD would work here, too?). I've not tried it before on Linux (not had a reason too, as before Skype there really weren't any widely used video conferencing apps). -- Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
