On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:17 PM, krad <kra...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On 3 July 2010 00:05, Maxim Khitrov <mkhit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I'm configuring pf on FreeBSD 7.3 and would like to use the following >> altq settings: >> >> altq on $ext priq bandwidth 9240Kb queue {low, red, med, top} >> altq on {$int1, $int2, $srv} priq bandwidth 100Mb queue {low, red, med, >> top} >> >> queue low priority 1 priq(default) # Default priority queue >> queue red priority 1 priq(red) # Default priority TCP queue with RED >> queue med priority 2 # DNS, DHCP, ACKs, and TOS == lowdelay >> queue top priority 3 # ICMP, NTP >> >> When I try to load these settings, I get the following errors: >> >> pfctl: low and red have the same priority >> pfctl: low and red have the same priority >> pfctl: low and red have the same priority >> pfctl: low and red have the same priority >> /etc/pf.conf:79: errors in queue definition >> >> OpenBSD 4.1 documentation states that "if two or more queues are >> assigned the same priority then those queues are processed in a >> round-robin fashion." Is there any specific reason why this behavior >> was altered in the FreeBSD port? >> >> I'm not really sure of what to do, because I don't want to prioritize >> or deprioritize TCP traffic, and I can't have RED enabled for any >> other protocol. If you have any other general-purpose queuing >> suggestions, please let me know. >> >> - Max > > check the version of pf in freebsd compared to openbsd, as they are not > always in sync >
I'm aware of this. FreeBSD 7.3 should be using pf from OpenBSD 4.1: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/firewalls-pf.html#AEN39617 - Max _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"