On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Greg Larkin <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Maness wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Chris Maness <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Greg Larkin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Chris Maness wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Greg Larkin <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris Maness wrote: >>>>>>>> What would cause a configure script to fail? See output bellow. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chris Maness >>>>>>>> (909) 223-9179 >>>>>>>> http://www.chrismaness.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since we've been conversing privately for a bit, I went back to your >>>>>>> original message and found something that might benefit you and the list >>>>>>> as a whole, if someone else runs into this problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see this error message: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> configure.ac:21: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, ...): >>>>>>> suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached >>>>>>> ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1973: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... >>>>>>> ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1993: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from... >>>>>>> /usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool15.m4:615: AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION is >>>>>>> expanded from... >>>>>>> /usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool15.m4:4815: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC >>>>>>> is expanded from... >>>>>>> /usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool15.m4:2651: _LT_AC_LANG_C_CONFIG is >>>>>>> expanded from... >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Notice the pathname "/usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool15.m4". You >>>>>>> emailed me privately with the list of your installed packages, and you >>>>>>> have libtool-2.2.6b installed. This libtool15.m4 file seems to conflict >>>>>>> with that version of libtool, so please post the output of this command: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pkg_which /usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool15.m4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> Greg >>>>>> It just returned a ?. So does that mean that it is not referenced by >>>>>> any package? If it is not, can I just delete it? Also, this seems to >>>>>> be the issue with libX11. Someone gave me a similar response for >>>>>> libX11 on the X11 list. However, they have not gotten back to me on >>>>>> what I should do with it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Chris Maness >> Yes, I believe you can safely delete it. Just to be 100% sure, rename >> it temporarily, and then try the build again. It should also fix the >> libX11 issue. >> >> Regards, >> Greg >>>> >>>> >>> It made it past the hang up ;o) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris Maness >>> > >> It is all working now. I am forcing a rebuild of all downstream deps >> for libX11. Is libSM down stream from libX11 as well? Hopefully >> after that is done I can get virtualbox-ose to compile. > >> Thanks, >> Chris Maness > > Hi Chris, > > Good news! Try pkg_info to find up- and downstream dependencies for libX11: > > pkg_info -r libX11-\* # Upstream > pkg_info -R libX11-\* # Downstream > > It doesn't look like libX11 and libSM depend on each other on my machine. > > Regards, > Greg > - -- > Greg Larkin
It looks like they are not directly related to one another. I guess my machine will have to huff and puff on those deps too. Thanks for all the help, Chris Maness _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
