On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:46:50 +0200 David DEMELIER <demelier.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/6/1 Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com>: > The differences are that portupgrade use a database, it's written in > ruby while portmaster is only one shell script. That's why I really > prefere portmaster that also have zsh completion and is faster. Am I the only one to regard portmaster's lack of a failsafe install as a significant problem? All three tools will make a back-up of an installed package before deinstalling it and installing the new version. If this fails Portupgrade and portmanager will immediately restore the backup usually with no more disruption that a normal upgrade. Portmaster leaves you to restore the backup manually which is a minor hassle if you notice it immediately, a problem if you find out the hard way, and a potential nightmare if you miss it altogether. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
