-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> > It's different, yes. That could be due to running DHCP6 -- after all, > the daemon has to have some way of receiving all the DHCP traffic to the > various site- and link- local addresses. You can test that by turning > off dhcpd and checking the routing table with it not running. If the > route doesn't disappear, try disabling dhcpd in /etc/rc.conf, rebooting > and then see if that route is still present. Either way, re-enable > dhcpd in rc.conf and re-start the daemon: if the route appears then it's > required by dhcpd and everything looks to be in order. I removed this route, and it did not reappear when i restarted the DHCP6 server. It also did not affect the situation, i still get no leases. > Ah. Yes, this might cause you problems. Possibly. If Internode DHCP6 > has been configured as authoritative for your address range and if the > query packets from your client can reach Internode's DHCP6 server then > you probably will have trouble. I shouldn't think its likely though -- > your client's DHCP6 initial queries will be to find a server on the same > network segment, and to reach the Internode servers it would have to hop > through your gateway machine, which is your DHCP6 server anyhow. Well, it seems that the packets are all being sent to my gateway, not internode. > > If your network prefix is dynamically assigned, then I don't think there > is a way to have a DHCP6 server be a DHCP6 client as well, and pass on > the prefixes it has obtained dynamically. BICBW. If your ISPs policy > is actually to assign you a particular prefix permanently rather than > give you one out of some dynamically assigned pool, then it's worth a > try using a static configuration on your gateway machine -- I believe > you said this was a test setup to see if it could be rolled out on a > customer network? Should be fine to try static configuration like that > for a limited time even supposing it's all dynamically assigned. I tried, but the moment i turned off dhcp6c, i lost ipv6 connectivity, so no go sadly. Well, now i have a server that listens properly, but when my client sends it solicits, it dosen't pick them up at all. might be time to start playing with wireshark and tcpdump I guess. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: [email protected] Kent, CT11 9PW > William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMewPVAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JUfIQAIXkS5ocTuI+cf8kuB/ByNC/ wkybfdFoqh3ac1c2v1q/KD0ZhPWKGTN93x5f9rmdDO1BiCrBvDQGONh32xOImgt+ a/XuGL5kNZi24iW5JRHSHgS5hJmLqtZpuN2nYG28WBQJzSTfKEi61lMq55EFcAL5 VKUTTvSv9i3us5WbuzdjPoP0VScjkJjhycOYZW4YmWVbcnVdl4xdfqkZr1qevRE3 /d3YO4GO++ZsY7y6Ria1WDt6ckP2Arf2zic8UTSGJnv1h1GHo+iU6KSGpbCFqnNW XcR7ics/cUwjCiyG870EBWBTtHM45+WC1JhTHUUI4UQmPCv+Ux7cTI3j0/JHQE/r sgAgBiloi5qRrNntOVZwIhtGCilGj2ZWR+3C/HMb9YbBkKGQTYzd60Madj4L2dWQ XVKAakV4HOvC/+vv5r7nsZLv2OFRNmEoHIybfE++uXGl+YZ5iK+Cyh/ziRhsp8ji XoViwmINSm04cz+6V/bkzhSh84OYf+iIWLKPLT9fuyFU3jQtSmXX9N4UTmLKp2Xx Ps48wfv+sZi7P2Ho74dGxrh8vmZnYsTpGR0x4q/eMNY+gD3IsF/tIlYsnwqxxGqt vpUdP3d40OLFDoM+ncsJS1bLL/qshZCJDXeuiUuzsW6kUkAt/cFhAeNRgF7O5gLP rNlJwiTGlUADar6hPi6O =RIEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
