On 24/09/2010 21:05:45, Derek Funk wrote: > There was a post some time ago someone was complaining that FreeBSD > still uses and archaic filesystem and not a new FS like ext4. Some > replied, seeming like a code contributor, with a very sounded reply. > What is that reply?
ZFS
or words to that effect. Linux has nothing comparable.
Cheers,
Matthew
Not that UFS2 comes off badly when compared to ext{3,4}. There's
something pretty dodgy about a filesystem that insists on being fsck'd
every 180 days or 30 remounts.
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
