Jerry <freebsd.u...@seibercom.net> writes: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:33 -0500 > Doug Poland <d...@polands.org> articulated: > >> If I understand the OPs question correctly, I believe setting the >> environment variable BATCH=yes will give desired results with >> portupgrade. This will cause port compile defaults to be used in >> lieu of an existing /var/db/ports/*/options file. > > I was of the opinion, and I could be wrong, that setting 'BATCH=yes' > simply stopped the build process from attempting to create an options > file; however, it would use an existing one if it was present. Perhaps > someone with more intimate knowledge of this would care to comment. I > say this because I have used the BATCH technique once I had all of my > ports configured the way I wanted. Subsequent updates always appeared to > use any existing configuration files.
In two minutes of looking at bsd.port.mk, I confirmed that this is correct. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
