Yes, I would recommend that configuration also, because FreeBSD is much more lightweight of the two, so you don't impose the overhead of running Windows when all you need is FreeBSD.
Quoth Ross Cameron on Saturday, 06 November 2010: > Personally I would install FreeBSD as the primary operating system and > install Windows in a VirtualBox VM. > > That way you can get the best of both worlds and no need to reboot to access > a particular application. > > > > > > "Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in > overalls and looks like work." > Thomas Alva Edison > Inventor of 1093 patents, including: > The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. > > > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tushar <tushar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I want to use windows and freeBSD, both of them at the same time... > > please help... > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips.com
pgp4DjFCTcWzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
