On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:45:41PM -0500, Jon Radel wrote:
> On 1/24/11 2:33 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > oKay, since my prev question caught no wixards, how about looking at
> > the errors from bind-9.3.6? [I rebuilt this from the src tarball; it
> > finally installed; I fixed some obvious errors, but several remain.
> >
> > Here is the log file where bind9 fails on "em0", my NIC in my server.
> > This is one failure that is simply over my head.
> >
> >+++
> >
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
> >/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket:
> >address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: creating IPv4 interface em0 failed;
> >interface ignored
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket:
> >address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: creating IPv4 interface lo0 failed;
> >interface ignored
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: not listening on any interfaces
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: couldn't add command channel
> >127.0.0.1#953: address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: couldn't add command channel ::1#953:
> >address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket:
> >address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: creating IPv4 interface em0 failed;
> >interface ignored
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: could not listen on UDP socket:
> >address in use
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: creating IPv4 interface lo0 failed;
> >interface ignored
> >Jan 24 11:14:55 ethic named[59747]: running
> >+++
> >
> > Can anybody explain why (eg) the lo0 failed or was ignored. And
> > why bind9--now offically at its EOLife--has trouble creating an
> > IPv4 interface with my NIC, em0? Do I have to do some very simple?
> > like rebooting?
> >
>
> It appears to be complaining that you're already running another piece
> of software that is listening
> on all those ports. I'd be guessing another copy of bind. Try:
>
> ps uxwwa | grep named
>
> and see what all is running. If you're dealing with a bind from base
> and bind from ports I could
> see you trying to start both of them. Do you have named files in both
> /etc/rc.d and /usr/local/etc/rc.d?
>
> --
>
> --Jon Radel
> j...@radel.com
>
>
There is only one /etc/rc.d/named script; in fact, I have neven seen
one from bind9-3 or bind9-7 [in /usr/local/etc/rc.d].
You're right about dup instances of named going! I'll kill9 and
see what happens when i restart.
Jan 24 12:37:04 ethic named[60266]: creating IPv4 interface lo0 failed;
interface ignored
Jan 24 12:37:04 ethic named[60266]: running
Jan 24 12:59:32 ethic named[60411]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
Jan 24 12:59:32 ethic named[60411]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
Jan 24 12:59:32 ethic named[60411]: command channel listening on ::1#953
Jan 24 12:59:32 ethic named[60411]: running
You're good, Jon!
Somebody mentioned this yesterday but i had already KILLED my named.
Just by script. So, should I follow the FBSD tradition of: if it
works, why upgrade? Or should I try buind97 again?
.... tHe reason for all this caution is that bind97 output a trucloak
of errors that well way the hell over my head. And I really do need
UDP.
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
http://journey.thought.org
ethic
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
