On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera <andre...@zoho.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske <dte...@vicor.com> wrote: >> If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent >> execution. The reason you're having inconsistent behavior is because Linux >> has /bin/sh symbolically linked to /bin/bash while FreeBSD has a more >> traditional shell (we'll call it bourne shell "plus"). > > that is misleading because command substitutions have traditionally > invoked subshells, and freebsd sh(1)/ash is an exception, not the norm > > in this case, ksh and bash deviates are clearly closer to standard > bourne behaviour >
Thanks for that explanation. I can understand the benefits of optimizing away subshell execution, but that can clearly lead to unexpected behavior. Is there some documentation on when this optimization is utilized (i.e. the command executed without a subshell)? Would I be correct in assuming that it is only restricted to built-in commands that are known not to produce any output, such as 'exit'? - Max _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
