On 04/04/11 01:15, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:37:50AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:46:26 -0600, Chad Perrin<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 03:43:59AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
For example, you could install an IMAP interface for mail stored on
the server, so you can access it by any IMAP capable client you
want, and you could even install a web mail client (e. g.
roundcube) to bind to that IMAP inter- face. In my opinion, this is
way better than the POP/no-SMTP thing I'm currently doing.
Why Roundcube? From what I've seen, it doesn't handle quote
indentation and marking properly.
Why not? :-)
Please tell me why you would want to inflict this kind of behavior on
others:
> > >
> > > For example, you could install an IMAP interface for mail
stored on
> > > the server, so you can access it by any IMAP capable client you
> > > want, and you could even install a web mail client (e. g.
> > > roundcube) to bind to that IMAP inter- face. In my opinion,
this is
> > > way better than the POP/no-SMTP thing I'm currently doing.
I've seen Roundcube do this crap. It does *not* make me happy when
trying to skim through emails quickly -- and it can be bad when reading
more closely, too.
In the near future I'm probably going to have to implement a web mail
system for times when my clients are travelling and don't have access to
an IMAP capable client. If Roundcube isn't a decent solution, what is?
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
