On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 04:12, <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you're just using the 192.168.4.129 - 254 addresses >> I would change it to >> >> subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > Shouldn't that be netmask 255.255.255.128?
That's what I thought at first as well. Then I saw the router at 192.168.4.1, so it looks like they're using the entire /24 but only assigning addresses via DHCPd to the top half. kmw _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
