Well, the idea was to run many instances of the app (each process does not need more than a couple of gigs of ram). Using virtualization is another option, but it will require a lot more maintenance of every VM. It would be a lot better if a single OS can use PAE.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 3:47 PM, krad wrote: > > > On 14 April 2011 11:14, Dennis Nikiforov <dennis.nikifo...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit systems, > so going to 64 bit is not possible. > > On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:08 PM, krad wrote: > >> >> >> On 14 April 2011 08:05, Dennis Nikiforov <dennis.nikifo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a problem with FreeBSD 7.x 32bit running the standard PAE >> kernel on a dell R210 server with 16GB of RAM. All servers spec'ed like this >> have the same identical problem and it is not a hardware issue because all >> memory tests have been negative. >> >> basically the issue comes after PAE kernel has been compiled and the >> system outputs all the time the following: >> >> cannot fork kstack allocation failed or vm_thread_new: kstack >> allocation failed >> >> Since, this is a dell server there is basically nothing that I can >> disable in BIOS, so perhaps someone knows what loader options do I need to >> tweak the kernel and stop this from happening. >> >> Thanks, >> Dennis_______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> >> >> why not use 64 bit as the r210 should be capable > > > not even with lib32, also why not just not run pae. After all if its a 32bit > app it cant address all the ram anyhow _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
