On Monday 18 July 2011 16:49:25 DA Forsyth wrote: > After a hardrive let the smoke out last week, part of a 4 drive RAID > array, I am now battling to get back into the array. > I have replaced the bad drive and it has been rebuilt (Intel Matrix > Raid on the motherboard). > > some partitions are ok but had lots of errors fsck fixed, others > report > ** /dev/ar0s1f > BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST > ALTERNATE > > it then asks if it must look for alternates but claims 32 is not one > and stops. All my partitions are UFS so why doesn't it look at block > 160?
You may want to ask your question on the freebsd-fs mailing list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
