Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > >> > >> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response > >> time, here's your scenario: > >> > >> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries > >> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries > >> > >> Your cache will start building up and only responses that are not cached > >> will be taken from your NS A and B servers. > > > > Sorry, I fail to see how this is any better than two independent DNS > > servers. Perhaps a variant like > > > > DNS C, forward to DNS A > > DNS D, forward to DNS A > > > > would be close to the goal of cache consolidation. > > > > DNS A suffers an outage ; you're fucked, to put it bluntly.
Nope. DNS C and D will do the queries on their own. I don't suggest a "forward only" setup. I just want the servers to share the cache. [dd] > > On a side note, have you considered unbound ? > > It may be better suited to your needs and scale. I would read a comparison of BIND and Unbound with great interest. Do you perchance have a link? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
