On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:13:55 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: > > > > Why the heck did you ask for it, then? > > Fair enough, because in your post dated: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 > -0700, you make this remark: I think the statement was more like > "Someone who calls it 'open sore' is clearly a mean-spirited jackass > who likes making trouble," rather than "Down with the bourgeoisie!" I > just figured I'd help clarify. > > At that point I wanted to know how you could justify the use of one set > of terms and not the other. I NEVER said that you made or condoned > those statements, something I think you might finally be starting to > comprehend, although I certainly would not bet my life on it.
This is the problem. You say you never said I condoned such statements, but for some utterly incomprehensible reason you decided to ask me to explain my (nonexistent) justification for them. What you said distinctly implied that you believed I condoned them, for exactly that reason, whether you *meant* to imply such a thing or not. I wonder if *you* are going to start to comprehend *that*. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"