On 01/26/12 03:39, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Odhiambo Washington<odhia...@gmail.com>  wrote:
[...]

You know, sometimes all this process is what makes people shy off of *BSD. I am 
a diehard lover of FreeBSD, but the few times I have installed Linux on my 
laptop, this whole process was a breeze... well, not quite, but not as 
difficult as it is in FreeBSD. Luckily, I use WiFi more than I use 3G, so it's 
never quite bothered me. Even now, I just want to see how easy it can be on 
PC-BSD/FreeBSD, with a GUI to boot, if there is, but I do not feel it is such a 
big necessity for me, because I have D-Link DIR-825 which can use this modem on 
it's USB port and allow me to use 3G.

It used to be like that in Linux as well. It's only until recently
that the netowrk manager app supports 3g modems. The problem is when
these graphical apps fail you have virtually no way to see what's
going on, just plug and pray.

If you get the tty, using Wvdial is actuall much easier than any other
dialing/ppp tool I've ever used. So even on Linuxes with NM applet and
3g modem support I would use Wvdial, and on FBSD especially! wvdial is
much more robust than the nm apps, IMHO.

Network manager's a colossal screw up if you ask me- I had no end of trouble with it when I used linux. One very good reason to use FreeBSD when nm is inextricably linked to the core of linux (how is a gui app possibly allowed to do that, I'll never know).

Sorry; and now back to your regular thread...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to