On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:25:06 +1000 Da Rock articulated: > The biggest problem comes with using many interpreters of a single > language. Thankfully pcl works on the majority of printers (network), > and is practically a standard in the enterprise world, so you're > still not marooned with a paper weight :) Unless you're a printshop > and/or into graphic arts pcl will be more than sufficient for use. If > you are working in graphic arts then I doubt you'd be using a brother > or something that doesn't use pure ps anyway.
You might want to check out: <http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting>. It appears that "ps" is no-longer the format of choice but is being replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers. In addition, there is an active project creating a wrapper framework for the manufacturer's Windows/Mac OS X drivers, like the ndiswrapper for WLAN cards, which is something I suggested a long time ago. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"