> No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works > the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in > top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in > /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/ulpt
> Speaking of RAM savings, things you would always load > should be compiled in kernel, modules per design take > more RAM than compiled in stuff. I suppose with a generic kernel where many drivers would be put in modules and not the kernel proper, RAM would be less cluttered. I think that rationale was used with Linux, and I believe kernel modules came to Linux before FreeBSD and to FreeBSD before NetBSD, am not sure about other BSDs. I remember when it was necessary to "insmod hpfs" to mount an HPFS partition from Linux, it was not done automatically. Also, when adding a new device and driver, just that module could be compiled without recompiling the rest of the kernel: useful perhaps when installing a prefabricated Linux distribution. But when running on one specific computer, I see the rationale for NO_MODULES=yes. Now is there any way to prevent ulpt.ko from loading when a USB printer is connected? Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
