Hello. 2012/09/05 09:06:36 +0700 Victor Sudakov <v...@mpeks.tomsk.su> => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : VS> > Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution here is VS> > a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s). VS> VS> There is special Windows software for managing Natex MUXes. It works
[..] VS> Solution 2. Using an existing networked FreeBSD box sitting next to VS> the MUX, it already has COM ports. Advantage: cheap, no additional ok. no interactivity. But I'm still optimistic about virtualization. emulators/qemu at the least should be able to run that software and use com-ports from the master freebsd system at the same time. Then you can you can use remote access features for workstation access to the software. VS> doubts ... English is so poor coffee is your friend (c) -- Peter Vereshagin <pe...@vereshagin.org> (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
