On 01/18/13 02:29, Fbsd8 wrote:
The man page for tar command says there a 4 different compress types you can use, xz, bzip, bzip2 and gzip.
bzip and bzip2 are synonyms I believe.
Which one is the fastest and compresses the most?
The general rule for compression is that fast and high compression are opposite ends of the same axis.
I am using -z option for gzip and it sure is slow.
You can use --options gzip:N or --options xz:N where N is 0-9 to control the compression level for gzip or xz compression. 0 is the quickest, but least compressing, 9 slowest and most. You'd need to find the trade off that works best for you.
Hoping one of the other zip options are better. What do you guys use?
Historically gzip, these days bz2, but that's more habit than any scientifically based decision. Compression depends on the data anyway, so the only truly correct answer is "whatever works best for you".
Another question about tar is can I have tar create a compressed bkup of 2 files and a directory tree all in single tar command?
tar -cjf tarfile path/to/file1 path/to/file2 path/to/tree/root or if you don't want to keep path prefixes for the files or tree tar -cjf tarfile -C file1dir file1 -C file2dir file2 -C dirtree . Note the '.' at the end of that command. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
