On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:12:34 +0100 David Demelier <demelier.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/2013 17:23, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > > > Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> Yes, SDL Output works fine. I think that this should be the > >> default for the > >> following reasons: > >> - unlike OSS4 it doesn't require an additional external kernel > >> driver > >> - unlike PulseAudio it doesn't require any daemon (and possibly > >> extra configuration) > >> - unlike ALSA OSS plugin, SDL code is sane in its usage of OSS API > > > > The "real" OSS support was dropped by audacious somewhere in the > > past and is > > unfortunally no longer available. > > I can switch the default from OSS4 to SDL if this is what the > > community wants - I have no hard feeling here. > > Yes I think this is a better solution, OSSv4 is an huge port that must > *replace* the in-kernel mixer/soundcard support. > > Cheers, > David > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Could one of you show the steps to set SDL as the default sound system on FBSD instead of OSS? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"