On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Kraus <[email protected]> writes: > >> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd >> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem >> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make >> install' fails when trying to install the startup script to >> /usr/etc/rc.d instead of /etc/rc.d. It works fine if INST-BASE is >> disabled. I looked through the Makefile but could not suss out how >> that difference in configuration was actually causing the problem. >> >> Has anyone else run into this problem and what was the fix (or did you >> just install into /usr/local) ? > > I use /usr/local, but this seems to be a typo in the last checkin, > which changed the internal names of the port options to our brave new > naming scheme. > > If you look in the Makefile clause for installing to base, renaming the > option itself went correctly, but both halves of the '.if' now invoke > USE_RC_SUBR. That's correct for PREFIX, but for installing into base > should be USE_RCORDER instead. Lowell, That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find it. Thanks. Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ? -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
