> The pros and cons of FreeBSD based solution: > > + cheaper > + more reliable (my oppionion) > + have more experiences with this OS > + can be configured as one wish > - not all feautures of Windows (snapshot copy, backup utilities)
You can get most of this functionality with some clever scripting. > - correct hardware support (is 1Gbit/s network working correctly?, > hotswaping, RAID controller) I don't know about the nic, but I've had extremely good luck with the Dell RAID Cards on Linux. Usually once a driver comes out for a dell card on Linux, it's ported to BSD shortly afterward (aacraid for example). > Protocol support is probably the same (we need just NFS and SMB). It will be > used for users' data (home directories). > > What is your opinion? Does it make sense? > It makes perfect sense if you want better uptimes, less hassle, and a better performing OS. > Thanks in advance > > lk > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Jason Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Right to Life of Michigan _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"