On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:22:26AM +0100, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:04:47AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:45:27AM +0100, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > If I send an e-mail in mutt and bcc some recipients, I seem to be able
> > > to see the BCC headers in the received e-mails. Now to my mind, this
> > > defeats the object of Bcc.
> > > 
> > > This e-mail was bcc'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > I don't see any evidence of that in the message headers (check the
> > message yourself on http://docs.freebsd.org).  What makes you think
> > otherwise?
> I send a message from my work machine running mutt to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I also bcc that message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I then retrieve the message on my home machine using fetchmail, filter
> it with procmail and open it in mutt
> Viewing the headers, I can see 
> and this is on the mydomain.com address.
> I only noticed it because someone pointed out to me that my messages
> were coming complete with Bcc fields.
> I would guess that possibly the listmanager is removing the bcc field,
> so I have included you in this reply and bcc'd it to

I still see no bcc in this message.  The relevant headers are:

Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:22:26 +0100
From: Wayne Pascoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bcc field viewable in Mutt generated e-mails
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-System: FreeBSD i386 with kernel 4.8-STABLE
Sender: Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to