> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Wiese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 PM
> Subject: NAT and MTU
> I have a machine that is being double-NAT'd.
> Would it make sense to set the MTU lower to account for the 
> NAT overhead?
> It makes sense to me as I know MTU, but I like to check in 
> case my thinking
> isn't right. :)

Why would it matter? Does NAT increase the overall datagram size? I thought it just 
changed addresses and stored connection information in a table somewhere. If this is 
the case, just having NAT, even 2x, isn't going to make it any more likely that your 
traffic will fragment.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to