** Reply to note from Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 30 Jul 2003 15:24:53 -0400
> You're probably right Then I'll try the upgrade and see what happens. > although that is a very small number of mbufs. In fact, I happened to think that to. > Are you deliberately setting it low? No. > Maybe by specifying "maxusers" in your kernel config? I have maxusers 0, which should mean "auto", shouldn't it? In fact on another machine I manage I have: 91/528/18304 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 90 mbufs allocated to data 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers 64/216/4576 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 564 Kbytes allocated to network (4% of mb_map in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines but here I've got four times the amount of RAM (0.5GB vs. 128MB). bye & Thanks av. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"