> Coming from a Network Engineering perspective, I'm interested in having
> my servers be as redundant as possible. I have two NIC's in the
> machine, so I would like for the "server" to be reachable over either
> To my mind, I would give a loopback interface an IP address that is the
> "server" in this case. Then, each interface would have it's own subnet
> and I would route over those two interfaces to the loopback for all
> packets destined to the server. So, something like:
> lo1 -> 192.168.1.1/32
> ed0 -> 172.16.1.2/30 ed1 -> 172.16.1.6/30
> Then, on the router, I have a route statement for 192.168.1.1/32 over the
> two interface subnets.
You could do this, but I'm not sure why you'd want to route those 2 to 1
interface. it'd be easier to make your server daemons listen on the 2 ed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"