On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 28), Marc Wiz said: > > Sticking with /bin/sh is a good idea. > > > > What I have done is build a static version of bash and put it /bin > > > > I changed root's shell to /bin/bash and run just fine. > > > > Has anyone noticed what a pain it is to build bash statically and > > install it in /bin? > > I don't use bash, but the bash2 port Makefile looks like it builds a > static binary by default: > > CONFIGURE_ENV= LDFLAGS=-static
You seem to be correct: $ ldd /bin/bash ldd: /bin/bash: not a dynamic executable I took no special pains - just built the port. -- Marc Ramirez Blue Circle Software Corporation 513-688-1070 (main) 513-382-1270 (direct) http://www.bluecirclesoft.com http://www.mrami.com (personal) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"