Walter C. Pelissero writes:

>  Ok, today I spent some time deciphering the ums log and came up
>  with this patch.


>  Unfortunately my knowledge (or rather lack of it) of the USB/UMS
>  driver doesn't give me very much confidence that I didn't break
>  something else.
>  What was that conditional return suposed to protect from?
>  Is it safe to remove it?

        The accepted way of finding out would be to do a send-pr to bring
it to the formal attention of the usual suspects.  (I can't seem to
find an appropriate item - anyone got suggestions?)

                                Robert Huff

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to