On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:45, Philip Kizer wrote: > Donald Burr of Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Description of:] > >Our gateway machine and server gets its own IP, IP A. > >My desktop machine is hooked up via ethernet. It should get IP B. > >Same thing as above for my roomie's desktop, except it gets IP C. > >[all else] Ideally I'd like them to be NAT'ted behind IP A > > Not really that strange a routing situation, and definitely pretty easy, > here's one possible way: [SNIP solution]
Just wondering... ..I've had to play with bridging recently because I'm playing with protocols that have IP's embedded in them, so I can't use NAT - would it be possible (though probably somewhat more complicated) to bridge the two ethernet interfaces together and NAT the third interface to an overloaded IP A? That way you get around needing to NAT the servers (which in my case I couldn't do anyway). Cheers, Aled. -- Aled Treharne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ThinkNuts! _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"