On Friday, 19 September 2003 at 0:56:04 +0000, Mark wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:44 AM > Subject: "May be forged"? > >> Thanks to Kris I found the new sendmail. :) But a slight anomaly occurs in >> 8.12.10: >> >> AUTH=server, relay=my-xp-machine.net [192.168.1.3] (may be forged), >> authid=admin >> >> That is odd; why would it suddenly say "may be forged"? > > Hmm, this wouldn't, by any chance, have anything to do with Verisign's > latest DNS crap, would it? Kinda like a preemptive caution that a "net" > domain might be fake?
No, this is the result of a failed reverse DNS lookup or a failed consistency check between forward and reverse DNS. Given that the address is in the non-routable RFC 1918 range, this is to be expected. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
