On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:21:44AM +0400, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: > Is it correct and/or clever to use BOTH > > 1) soft updates enabled and 2) hw.ata.wc=0 > > on FreeBSD-4.9 system? > > Will it enhance chances to have consistent disk > after power loss?
Yes. That is the reason its disabled by defauld. > How much slower it will be compared to the case of > > 1) soft updates enabled and 2) hw.ata.wc=1 The difference can be noticed. So i guess 15 or 20%. However I have no experince what so ever with this. > Thanks in advance for any comment. > Sergei > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"