On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:00:02PM -0400, Kenny Freeman wrote: > > I've been reading about unionfs and nullfs (well, more skim reading > > really; I'm not FS guru, which is why I'm asking here) and one of these > > sounds like it could be the idea solution. At first glance I'd say that > > unionfs would be the way to go.
Both unionfs and nullfs are documented to be broken. Seriously, those big scary warnings in the manpages are there for a reason! Having said that, some people have reported success in certain limited situations. If you insist on using them, then you're on your own if/when it breaks. This means: do not complain to us when your system crashes and you lose a filesystem. Kris
Description: PGP signature