thank you.. Im realy only blocking 135 due to the MSBlaster and others... no Samba yet
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shawn Guillemette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:00 AM Subject: Re: ipfw question > >63000 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any 119 via > sis0 > >63000 24 1152 deny log logamount 100 tcp from any to any 135 via sis0 > >63000 0 0 deny log logamount 100 udp from any to any 135 via > sis0 > > >63000 is the rule number correct? > >IM wondering what the other 2 places are.. > >24 and 1152 > if you're getting 0 on the other rules, it probably means its not running > those rules. > So therefore it won't actually log if it isn't get to that rule. > > also from the looks of things, if you're trying to block windows > filesharing/smb you > might want to block 135 - 139 both tcp/udp (instead of specifiying 135 in > the rule add '135-139') > rather than just 135 tcp/udp > > >Are they inbound and outbound? > well depends (could be both yes), anything thats aimed at tcp 135 will be > denied and > logged > > >Do I make any sence? > > Not really :/ whats the question? > > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
