On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
> Hello all,
>    Maybe this is not the best list to post this question,
> but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source
> for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the
> policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has
> been described as very unstable at the present time.

What do you mean by "policy for 5.1 package-feeding"?


Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to