On Friday 30 January 2004 20:31, stan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -0000, Edmund Craske wrote: > > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install > > the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make > > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of > > differences in command line arguments. Of course, you could just work it > > out and hash it together, or leave the base bind8 alone entirely and > > install bind9 as a separate port... It doesn't really matter either way, > > just make sure you're executing the bind9 named instead of the bind8 one. > > Thnaks for the advice. > > I found the startup flags issue. it's as simple as not needing the "-g > bind". Only the -u bind is allowd. > > I suppose I should make an effort to run this chrooted. Given that I did > specify the DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 optin, would the correct palce tp > chroot be /etc/namedb?
I've got a patch for this for -CURRENT (rcng), filed it at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61647 -- Melvyn ======================================================= FreeBSD sarevok.webteckies.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Wed Jan 28 18:01:18 CET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAREVOK_NOAPM_NODEBUG i386 =======================================================