On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:51:35PM +1030, Paul A. Hoadley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:33:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I recommend bogofilter for per-user filtering. Spamassassin is also > > highly recommended for site use. > > I'll second both. SpamAssassin worked well for me for several years, > but I recently changed from SA to bogofilter because SA just wasn't > keeping up with the latest craze of random word spams. Fortunately, I > had a 26,000-spam corpus with which to train bogofilter, so it's > already working quite well. It seems to be learning the random word > spams gradually.
I had problems with those bayes-busters for a while until I adjusted my cutoff scores (according to the recommendation of bogotune)..it now catches all of those with 99% accuracy too. Kris
Description: PGP signature