On Wednesday, 18 February 2004 at 9:34:29 +0100, Danny Carroll wrote: > Quoting Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I answered an almost identical question yesterday: it depends on the >> volume structure, which you haven't stated. Look at >> http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html and supply in >> particular the output of 'vinum list', unless the following applies: >> >> If this volume has only one plex, you're lost, unless you can bring up >> the failed disk long enough to make a backup. > > Here is the output: > > 20 drives:
As Tony Frank points out, this is 16 too many. But it shouldn't be related to your problems. I don't see the rest of the information I ask for. > I am only interested in the big one (data) the others were just for > experimentation.... I thought since the plex was setup as raid5 it > would be ok? Should be. > I have 4 106gb subdisks, and see 318Gb of data... The 4th subdisk > is becuase of the loss from Raid5 right? This is the overhead for the RAID-5 parity. > Did I set this up incorrectly? Only as noted. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
Description: PGP signature