On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Michael Conlen wrote:
Does FreeBSD's NFS implementation allow for caching of documents on the client side, either its self or through the VM system's inactive pages?

Yes to both. NFS clients typically use something called biod or nfsoid, which implements some combination of caching and I/O request coalescing in order to reduce the amount of network traffic going to the server.

[ Yes, this means that fsync() over NFS isn't guaranteed to actually have bits written to disk, at least historically... ]

The reason I'm asking is that I'm trying to size an NFS server using a few of many similar sites that I hope to cluster. The performance so far has been great, but I'm worried that there's something I'm missing here that will cause the performance/usage to change in a very nonlinear way. Any thoughts on the subject are appreciated.

Well, you are going to be bottlenecked potentially by your network or by the maximum I/O rate that your NFS server can sustain. Your data suggests you ought to be able to handle about two orders of magnitude more net traffic, if you're over a dedicated 100 Mbs connection between server and clients (ie, using a switch), so it's likely that you're going to run into limits due to your disks well before then.

You can probably switch to using rsync or some other replication scheme instead of NFS if you do run into limits, and keep the files locally if need be.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to