Dave Watkins writes: > I've just setup my first IPv6 router following the documentation > here > > http://justjohnnyweb.net/~cruisefx/Documents/IPv6/HOWTO_Debian_Masq_IPV6.html > > and rather than having a 3ffe:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/64 number > assigned I have a 3ffe:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx/128 whichs seems > to break things further down the chain as radvd then complains in > the logs that "prefix length should be 64 for eth0". > > Is this something I have done wrong somewhere or is this > something happening further up the chain?
For what it's worth: gif0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1280 tunnel inet 184.108.40.206 --> 220.127.116.11 inet6 3ffe:bc0:8000::2b31 --> 3ffe:bc0:8000::2b30 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fef8:17af%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 Everything works; nothing complains. "It ain't broke.". Have you asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Huff _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"