On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:56:08PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: ... > > the above configuration means that if queue 1 is getting a bandwidth > > X, then queue 2 will get 0.99X, queue 3 will get 0.98X, queue > > 4 will get 0.97X. Hardly matching any reasonable definition of high-mid-low > > priority! > > Hmm, I think I did it that way because 100 is the largest number > and I didn't decide on how many queues I may add later so the numbers will > change but does the weight number really mean 99%, 98%, 97% priority? So > should it really be 66, 33, and 1?

no, the weights mean exactly what i wrote above, and they are weights not priorities. As to the values to use, that's entirely up to you. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"