On Tuesday 08 June 2004 09:36 am, Bill Moran wrote: > Peter Risdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Huff wrote: > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch > > >> sees many commits that are likely to be problematic. > > > > > > In general, no. > > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > QED > > I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... > > What's "QED"?
I remember seeing that at the end of mathematical proofs at the University where the professor was too lazy to finish their documentation. It was much more fitting here :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"