On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 04:05 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > What you want is RELENG_5, which doesn't exist yet. It will be created > when 5.x is considered to be the new -STABLE. Until then you can > either follow -CURRENT (which is the "branch" leading up to the next > 5.x release just as RELENG_4 is the branch leading up to the next 4.x > release) or RELENG_5_2 (which is 5.2.1-RELEASE + important bugfixes) > > > As for what the other tags are: RELENG_5_1 and RELENG_5_0 are as > RELENG_5_2 except for 5.1-release and 5.0-release respectively - little > reason to use them. The RELENG_5_x_BP tags are branches but static > tags marking the place where the RELENG_5_x branch was created from > HEAD. RELENG_5_x_y_RELEASE marks the code for 5.x.y-release, and also > doesn't change. There is little reason to use either of those unless > you for some reason want the exact code that went into a relase. > > I was trying to install ports using /stand/sysinstall and it was complaining that 5.2-CURRENT didn't exist on any of the ftp mirrors i was trying and I should change to an appropriate release in the 'Options' menu. What should this be if I have 5.2.1 installed and want to track -CURRENT?
Thanks. -- Cheers, Trey --- "I might repeat to myself slowly and soothingly, a list of quotations beautiful from minds profound - if I can remember any of the damn things." -- Dorothy Parker 10:19pm up 23:55, 3 users, load average: 0.29, 0.27, 0.31 Linux linux 2.6.5-7.95-default #1 Thu Jul 1 15:23:45 UTC 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part